| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2012:T163907.20120217 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 17 February 2012 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1639/07 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 01306755.8 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G06F 17/60 G06F 3/12 G06F 13/00 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | E-mail printing apparatus and method and E-mail printing program | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.5.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Inventive step (no) | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
"An effect cannot be validly used in the formulation of the technical problem if the effect requires additional information not at the disposal of the skilled person even after taking into account the content of the application in question."(See point 2.5 of the reasons) |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t071639eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021