Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

T 0012/00 () of 7.11.2002

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T001200.20021107

Date of decision:

07 November 2002

Case number:

T 0012/00

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

B

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 33Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Hydrogen-absorbing composition for optical fiber cables and optical fiber cables incorporating such compositions

Applicant name:

PIRELLI CAVI E SISTEMI S.p.A.

Opponent name:

Alcatel Kabel Beteiligungs-AG

Board:

3.4.02

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention 1973 Art 52(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 54
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 56
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 111(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 114(2)

Keywords:

Late submitted material - appeal
Public prior use
Third parties
Decision re appeals - remittal (yes)

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

G 0010/91
G 0001/95
G 0007/95
T 0220/83
T 0482/89
T 0472/92
T 0782/92
T 1002/92
T 0097/94
T 0301/94
T 1007/95
T 0254/98

Citing decisions:

T 1464/05
T 2043/07
T 0202/13

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t000012eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

17 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Case Law Book: III Amendments

X CLR III G 4.3.2.A Both parties have access to the evidence : balance of probabilities

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V A 2.6.3.D Statement of the legal or factual reasons

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

X G 0010/91 (Examination of opposition/appeals) of 31.3.1993

X G 0001/95 (Fresh grounds for opposition) of 19.7.1996

X G 0007/95 (Fresh grounds for opposition) of 19.7.1996

General Case Law

X T 0220/83 (Grounds for appeal) of 14.1.1986

X T 0482/89 (Power supply unit) of 11.12.1990

X T 0472/92 (Joint Venture/SEKISUI) of 20.11.1996

X T 0782/92 () of 22.6.1994

X T 1002/92 (Queueing system) of 6.7.1994

X T 0097/94 (Procedural timetable) of 15.7.1997

X T 0301/94 (Green glass/AVIR) of 28.11.1996

X T 1007/95 (Appeal inadmissible/PERSTORP) of 17.11.1998

X T 0254/98 ("Evidence not completely within the power of the opponent") of 26.9.2000

X T 1464/05 (Hydrogen-absorbing composition/PRYSMIAN) of 14.5.2009

X T 2043/07 () of 13.1.2010

X T 0202/13 () of 10.7.2015