J 0006/99 (Examination fee reduction/AUSIMONT) of 25.10.1999

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1999:J000699.19991025
Date of decision: 25 October 1999
Case number: J 0006/99
Application number: 93101140.7
IPC class: C10M 107/38
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: C
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 735 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Process for reducing the back migration in mechanical vacuum pumps operating with perfluoro-polyether oils
Applicant name: Ausimont S.p.A.
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.1.01
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 14(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 14(4)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 23(3)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 75
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 92
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 94(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 94(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 94(3)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 164(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 164(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 6(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 6(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 6(3)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 67
European Patent Convention 1973 R 69(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 85b
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(2)
Rules relating to fees Art 12
Guidelines for examination in the EPO A-XI, 9.2(3)
Keywords: Fees - reduction - time limit to file a request for examination in an official language of a Contracting State other than English, French or German
Fees - appeal fee - reimbursement - substantial procedural violation - no
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
G 0006/91
Citing decisions:
T 0347/04

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/j990006eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

4 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law Book: V Priority

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law