European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2000:J002596.20000411 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 11 April 2000 | ||||||||
Case number: | J 0025/96 | ||||||||
Application number: | 91915567.1 | ||||||||
IPC class: | - | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | C | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | - | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.1.01 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
Keywords: | Re-establishment - time limits for entry into the regional phase before the EPO Admissibility - yes - transitional case Allowability - due care of US representative - no Application of principle of proportionality - no |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/j960025eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021