| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2013:J000913.20130724 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 24 July 2013 | ||||||||
| Case number: | J 0009/13 | ||||||||
| Application number: | - | ||||||||
| IPC class: | - | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | - | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | - | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.1.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Appointment of a professional representative Appeal deemed not to have been filed |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
The fact that the Russian Federation is a party or a member of the "Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between the EU countries and the Russian Federation" and the WTO/TRIPS Agreement, does not relieve a resident of the Russian Federation from the obligation pursuant to Article 133(2) EPC to be represented by a professional representative in proceedings before the European Patent Office. |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/j130009eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
10 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
EPC Implementing Rules
Offical Journal of the EPO
Case Law Book: III Amendments
XCLR III V 2.2 Duty of persons without residence nor place of business within a contracting state to be represented by a professional representative