GL F II 4.6 Rule 42(1)(c) vs. Art. 52(1)

If it is decided that an independent claim defines a patentable invention within the meaning of Art. 52(1), it must be possible to derive a technical problem from the application. In this case the requirement of Rule 42(1)(c) is fulfilled (see T 26/81).[Rule 42(1)(c); ]

5 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

EPC Implementing Rules

EPO Guidelines - F The European Patent Application

General Case Law