4.3.1 General 4.3.2 "Fundamental" violation of Article 113 EPC – causal link and adverse effect 4.3.3 No prior assessment of the merits of a submission 4.3.4 Objective approach – board's intention irrelevant 4.3.5 No obligation to provide detailed reasons for a decision in advance 4.3.6 Boards' obligation to remain neutral 4.3.7 Parties' obligation to participate actively in the appeal proceedings 4.3.8 Reasons for a decision allegedly surprising 4.3.9 Timing of a decision allegedly surprising 4.3.10 Consideration of the parties' arguments in the written decision 4.3.11 Parties' obligation to know the case law, references to decisions 4.3.12 No right to be heard separately on all requests 4.3.13 No right to a further hearing at first instance 4.3.14 No right to a referral under Article 112 EPC 4.3.15 No right to a communication; communication allegedly misleading 4.3.16 Late-filed submissions – boards' discretion under Article 13 RPBA 2007 4.3.17 Alleged violation of Article 113(2) EPC 4.3.18 Further examples of unsuccessful petitions 4.3.19 Successful petitions under Article 112a(2)(c) EPC Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/caselaw/2019/e/clr_v_b_4_3.htmDate retrieved: 17 May 202122 references found. Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Case Law Book: III AmendmentsXCLR III B 1 IntroductionLoading...Case Law Book: V PriorityXCLR V B Proceedings before the Enlarged Board of AppealLoading...XCLR V B 4 Grounds for petition for reviewLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.1 GeneralLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.2 "Fundamental" violation of Article 113 EPC – causal link and adverse effectLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.3 No prior assessment of the merits of a submissionLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.4 Objective approach – board's intention irrelevantLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.5 No obligation to provide detailed reasons for a decision in advanceLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.6 Boards' obligation to remain neutralLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.7 Parties' obligation to participate actively in the appeal proceedingsLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.8 Reasons for a decision allegedly surprisingLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.9 Timing of a decision allegedly surprisingLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.10 Consideration of the parties' arguments in the written decisionLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.11 Parties' obligation to know the case law, references to decisionsLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.12 No right to be heard separately on all requestsLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.13 No right to a further hearing at first instanceLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.14 No right to a referral under Article 112 EPCLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.15 No right to a communication; communication allegedly misleadingLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.16 Late-filed submissions – boards' discretion under Article 13 RPBA 2007Loading...XCLR V B 4.3.17 Alleged violation of Article 113(2) EPCLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.18 Further examples of unsuccessful petitionsLoading...XCLR V B 4.3.19 Successful petitions under Article 112a(2)(c) EPCLoading...
