CLR V A 9.5.17 Cases concerning documentation and communications passing between the EPO and the parties

a) Ambiguous communication or wrong form

b) No reply to communication under Article 101 EPC

c) Wrong type of communication

d) Period set for opponent to reply to patentee's response

e) Observations not forwarded to other party

f) Appointment of professional representative

g) Warning in relation to a grace period

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/caselaw/2019/e/clr_v_a_9_5_17.htm

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

9 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V A Appeal procedure

X CLR V A 9.5 Substantial procedural violation

X CLR V A 9.5.17.A Ambiguous communication or wrong form

X CLR V A 9.5.17.B No reply to communication under Article 101 EPC

X CLR V A 9.5.17.C Wrong type of communication

X CLR V A 9.5.17.D Period set for opponent to reply to patentee's response

X CLR V A 9.5.17.E Observations not forwarded to other party

X CLR V A 9.5.17.F Appointment of professional representative

X CLR V A 9.5.17.G Warning in relation to a grace period