European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2018:T044713.20180205 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 05 February 2018 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0447/13 | ||||||||
Application number: | 08153680.7 | ||||||||
IPC class: | G09G 5/00 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | C | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Display apparatus and control method thereof | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.4.03 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
Keywords: | Oral proceedings - non-attendance at oral proceedings in first instance proceedings Oral proceedings - opportunity to present comments (no) Remittal to the department of first instance - fundamental deficiency in first instance proceedings (yes) Reimbursement of appeal fee - (yes) |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
For the purposes of deciding whether to grant a request for postponement of oral proceedings on grounds of illness, the reference to "serious illness" in the Guidelines means an illness which is sufficiently serious to prevent the representative travelling to oral proceedings and presenting the case on the appointed day (Reasons, point 5.3). Where a request for postponement of oral proceedings is refused on the ground that the request was not sufficiently substantiated, it is incumbent upon the Examining Division to explain why it considers the substantiation insufficient. In other words, it should state in clear terms what, in its opinion, should have been submitted or explained, but was not (Reasons, point 6.4). |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t130447eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021