| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T091907.20090113 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 13 January 2009 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0919/07 | ||||||||
| Petition for review: | R 0008/09 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 98907067.7 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C07D 211/44 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Process for the preparation of 10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohept-5-enes and derivatives thereof | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | ROLABO S.L. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Medichem S.A. Schering Corporation |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Admission of documents alleged to be late filed (yes) Oral submission of accompanying persons (no) - respective requests in writing did not indicate what such submissions could contribute to the evidence on file Sufficiency of disclosure (yes) - no evidence to the contrary provided by the opponents Inventive step (yes) - skilled person would not have carried out the process with a reasonable expectation of success |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t070919eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021