| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2008:T090807.20080516 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 16 May 2008 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0908/07 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 98935396.6 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A01J 7/02 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Device for preparing cleaning liquid for a milking device, and a cleaning agent, for example for use in the device | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | PROLION B.V. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Octrooibureau Van der Lely N.V. | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.04 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | A late filed claim admitted in the exercise of the Board's discretion mainly because the Board and the opponent can be clearly expected to deal with the issues raised without adjournment of the oral proceedings, should not normally be remitted to the first instance for examination in regard of the grounds for opposition on which the first instance decision is based" (points 5.1.1 to 5.1.8 of the reasons). | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Late filed request Remittal in the case of a late filed request Novelty (main request: no) Added subject-matter (first, fourth auxiliary request: yes) Inventive step (2nd auxiliary request: no) Remittal (3rd auxiliary request: yes) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t070908eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021