European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T086807.20100316 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 16 March 2010 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0868/07 | ||||||||
Application number: | 04012122.0 | ||||||||
IPC class: | H04N 1/00 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | C | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Network facsimile apparatus | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Panasonic System Networks Co., Ltd. | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.5.04 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Amendments - added subject-matter (no) Inventive step (yes) after amendment |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
Replacement of an undisclosed feature by a more general feature disclosed in both parent and divisional applications allowed (see points 2 and 3) |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t070868eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
3 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application
XCLR II E 1.8.1 Replacing specific feature with more general term – no inclusion of undisclosed equivalents