European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2008:T106404.20080627 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 27 June 2008 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 1064/04 | ||||||||
Application number: | 98912425.0 | ||||||||
IPC class: | B01J 27/26 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | C | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Process for making double metal cyanide catalysts | ||||||||
Applicant name: | BAYER ANTWERPEN N.V. | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.3.07 | ||||||||
Headnote: | "Summary of principles derived from decison G 0007/93 on admission of amendments at late stage of proceedings (see point 4). In particular such admission is to be the exception not the rule." "Requests for amendments after oral proceedings which resulted in a communication indicating grant possible on an auxiliary request, are made at a late stage of proceedings (see point 4.2)" |
||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Correct exercise of discretion by the Examining Division under Rule 86(3) EPC 1973 | ||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t041064eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
12 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Implementing Rules
EPO Guidelines - H Amendments and Corrections
Case Law Book: IV Divisional Applications
XCLR IV B 3.3.3 Criteria for admitting amendments filed in reply to the Rule 71(3) EPC communication