| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T095097.20020326 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 26 March 2002 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0950/97 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 91908775.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | H01L 33/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Optoelectronic device | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.4.03 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | 'Product - by - process claim', clarity (yes) (process gives rise to clearly identifiable characteristics in devices produced by it) Novelty (yes) Inventive step (yes) The design of the claimed device makes possible the use of the advantageous and inventive method No direct incitation to modify the teaching of the closest prior art document to arrive at the claimed device |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t970950eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021