European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1990:T015889.19901120 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 20 November 1990 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 0158/89 | ||||||||
Application number: | 84105611.2 | ||||||||
IPC class: | B01J 23/74 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | |||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Catalyst and method for ortho-alkylation of hydroxyaromatic compounds | ||||||||
Applicant name: | General Electric Company | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.3.02 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Novelty (affirmed), after amendment of the claims Request for correction of errors (not allowable), two equally plausible possibilities of correction |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t890158eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
2 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application
XCLR II E 4.2.3 Obvious correction – immediately evident that nothing else would have been intended than what is offered as the correction