Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of includes/bootstrap.inc).

R 0013/14 () of 15.1.2016

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2016:R001314.20160115

Date of decision:

15 January 2016

Case number:

R 0013/14

Petition for review of:

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

B

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 172Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Polyethylene composition for injection moulding with improved stress crack/stiffness relation and impact resistance

Applicant name:

Borealis Technology Oy

Opponent name:

-

Board:

EBA

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)
European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(d)
European Patent Convention R 104(b)

Keywords:

Right to be heard violated [no]
Requests not dealt with [no]
Petition for review not allowable

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

R 0001/08
R 0004/11
R 0009/14

Citing decisions:

R 0005/15
R 0002/18

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r140013eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

11 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.112a EPC Article 112a Petition for review by the Enlarged Board of Appeal

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.104 EPC Further fundamental procedural defects

Case Law Book: III Amendments

X CLR III C 6.5 Location of oral proceedings

Case Law Book: V Priority

X CLR V B 3.4.3 No suspensory effect – review of substantive law excluded

X CLR V B 4.4.2 ‍‍Rule 104(b) EPC – failure to decide on a party's request

General Case Law

X R 0001/08 () of 15.7.2008

X R 0004/11 (Pour spout fitments/ELOPAK SYSTEMS) of 16.4.2012

X R 0009/14 (Fundamental violation of Art. 13(1) EPC) of 24.2.2015

X R 0005/15 (Right to be heard II/EURO-CELTIQUE) of 29.5.2017

X R 0002/18 (Petition for review) of 24.9.2018

X T 1142/12 () of 8.4.2014