European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1992:D000192.19920730 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 30 July 1992 | ||||||||
Case number: | D 0001/92 | ||||||||
Application number: | - | ||||||||
IPC class: | - | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
Distribution: | A | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | - | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | DBA | ||||||||
Headnote: | Headnote 1. Decisions of the Examination Board may in principle only be reviewed for the purposes of establishing that they do not infringe the REE, the provisions relating to its application or higher-ranking law. Value judgments are not, in principle, subject to judicial review. 2. It is not the task of the Disciplinary Board of Appeal to reconsider the examination procedure on its merits. Only serious and obvious mistakes, on which the contested decision is based, can be considered. The alleged mistake must be so obvious that it can be established without re-opening the entire marking procedure. |
||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | European Qualifying Examination Powers of the Disciplinary Board |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/d920001ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
6 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)