European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1989:D000389.19890305 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 05 March 1989 | ||||||||
Case number: | D 0003/89 | ||||||||
Application number: | - | ||||||||
IPC class: | - | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | DE | ||||||||
Distribution: | |||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | - | ||||||||
Applicant name: | - | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | DBA | ||||||||
Headnote: | I. Under current law a qualification from a German vocational college (Fachhochschule) cannot per se be accepted as corroboration of an equivalent level of scientific or technical knowledge within the meaning of Article 7(1)(a), second alternative, of the Regulation. II. EC directives and legislation in individual Member States are not binding on the European Patent Organisation but may give grounds for reviewing the law applicable to the Organisation and adapting it to changed attitudes in those States. III. Equivalent scientific or technical knowledge within the meaning of Article 7(1)(a), second alternative, of the Regulation may be demonstrated not only by an additional period of three years spent working in a range of activities pertaining to patent matters but also by relevant experience in another appropriate field (e.g. research). IV. No doubt exists about the validity of the way in which the examination procedure was drawn up. Its substance may be examined only for possible misuse of discretionary powers (see D 1/81, OJ EPO 1982, 258, and D 5/89, OJ EPO 1991, 218). V. The candidate has no right to an interview to demonstrate an equivalent level of scientific or technical knowledge. VI. To prevent undue hardship a candidate may be allowed to enrol for the European Qualifying Examination before completing three years' professional practice. VII. The admissibility of the Disciplinary Board of Appeal's referring a matter to the Enlarged Board of Appeal seems doubtful. Such action is unnecessary if the Disciplinary Board's decision is consistent with its case law. |
||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Extent of the powers of investigation and decision of the Disciplinary Board of Appeal Examination Board - drawing up the examination procedure Discretionary powers Not bound by EC directives or national law of Member States |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/d890003ep1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
4 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)