T 0676/94 (Radial tyre/SUMITOMO) of 6.2.1996

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1996:T067694.19960206
Date of decision: 06 February 1996
Case number: T 0676/94
Application number: 89302900.9
IPC class: B60C 9/22
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: B
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 682 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Radial tyre
Applicant name: SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Opponent name: COMPAGNIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN MICHELIN
Board: 3.2.01
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 83
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 100(b)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 111(1)
Keywords: Inventive step - skilled person - technical periodical
Undue burden of search for selecting this technical periodical (no)
Disclosure - sufficiency (yes)
Decision re appeals - remittal (yes)
Catchwords:

The answer to the question whether or not the contents of a technical periodical form part of the average knowledge of a skilled person and are thus to be taken into account on the issue of sufficiency of disclosure, depends on the facts of the case.

If the skilled person is working on the assembly of starting materials (in this case plastic fibres used to reinforce tyres) he can be expected to consult the relevant studies on these materials, especially those carried out by a very small number of manufacturers of these starting materials. Thus, these studies, even though disclosed in technical periodicals, are to be considered as part of the skilled person's average technical knowledge.

Cited decisions:
T 0171/84
T 0051/87
T 0475/88
T 0611/90
Citing decisions:
T 1167/97
T 0569/99
T 0890/02
T 0924/03

10 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPO Guidelines - G Patentability

Case Law Book: I Patentability

Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application

General Case Law