T 0646/13 () of 28.7.2017

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2017:T064613.20170728
Date of decision: 28 July 2017
Case number: T 0646/13
Application number: 06775680.9
IPC class: B44F 9/04
B44C 5/04
B44F 5/00
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: D
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 489 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Synthetic stone of high translucence, method of its production and use
Applicant name: Poljakov, Michal
Opponent name: E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Board: 3.2.05
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention R 76(2)(c)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 100(b)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 54(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 54(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 56
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 111(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 112(1)(a)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
Keywords: Admissibility of opposition - opposition substantiated (yes)
Late-filed evidence - admitted (yes)
Sufficiency of disclosure - enabling disclosure (yes)
Sufficiency of disclosure - relationship between Article 83 and Article 84
Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - uniform application of law (rejected)
Novelty - main request (yes)
Remittal to the department of first instance (no)
Inventive step - main request (yes)
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
G 0003/08
T 0464/05
T 1811/13
Citing decisions:
T 1224/12
T 0417/13
T 1326/15
T 1627/15
T 1628/15
T 2252/15
T 0187/16

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t130646eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

8 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Implementing Rules

Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application

Case Law Book: V Priority

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law