| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2017:T064613.20170728 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 28 July 2017 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0646/13 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 06775680.9 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B44F 9/04 B44C 5/04 B44F 5/00 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Synthetic stone of high translucence, method of its production and use | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Poljakov, Michal | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.05 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Admissibility of opposition - opposition substantiated (yes) Late-filed evidence - admitted (yes) Sufficiency of disclosure - enabling disclosure (yes) Sufficiency of disclosure - relationship between Article 83 and Article 84 Referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal - uniform application of law (rejected) Novelty - main request (yes) Remittal to the department of first instance (no) Inventive step - main request (yes) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t130646eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
