European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2013:T103112.20131205 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 05 December 2013 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 1031/12 | ||||||||
Application number: | 01999701.4 | ||||||||
IPC class: | D21G 3/00 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | D | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Doctor or coater blade and method in connection with its manufacturing | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Swedev Aktiebolag | ||||||||
Opponent name: | Rolf Meyer GmbH | ||||||||
Board: | 3.2.05 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
Keywords: | Extension beyond the application as filed - no Substantial procedural violation - no Remittal to the first instance |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t121031eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
4 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Articles
Case Law Book: III Amendments
XCLR III B 2.6.1.B Cases in which Article 113(1) EPC was not violated even though new claims or relevant documents were introduced