Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1445 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1445 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1445 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

T 2230/08 () of 19.5.2011

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T223008.20110519

Date of decision:

19 May 2011

Case number:

T 2230/08

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

D

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 33Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

Regeneration of catalyst/ABSORBER

Applicant name:

EMERACHEM LLC

Opponent name:

Daimler AG

Board:

3.3.07

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
European Patent Convention Art 123(3)
European Patent Convention R 139

Keywords:

Correction of error (no) - extension of scope of protection (yes) (main request) - extension of the content of the application as filed (yes) (auxiliary request)

Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:

G 0003/89
G 0001/93
T 0384/91
T 0553/99

Citing decisions:

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t082230eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

8 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

X A.123 EPC Amendments

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.139 EPC Correction of errors in documents filed with the European Patent Office

Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application

X CLR II E 3.3 Addition to the claim of an undisclosed feature limiting protection conferred, without providing a technical contribution

X CLR II E 4.2.2 Obvious error – incorrect information objectively recognisable

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

X G 0003/89 (Correction under Rule 88, second sentence, EPC) of 19.11.1992

X G 0001/93 (Limiting feature) of 2.2.1994

General Case Law

X T 0384/91 (Conflict) of 11.11.1992

X T 0553/99 (Undisclosed limiting feature/MANNESMANN) of 21.2.2001