| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T187208.20111020 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 20 October 2011 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1872/08 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 96119644.1 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C09D 11/00 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | C | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Ink set for ink jet recording and ink jet recording method using the same | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Seiko Epson Corporation | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Pelikan Produktions AG Alan J. Jones |
||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Admission of late filed documents and comparative tests not admitted before the first instance Sufficiency of disclosure and novelty (yes) - res judicata Main request: inventive step (yes) - non-obvious solution of a problem based on an advantageous effect demonstrated by means of comparative tests |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t081872eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021