| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2012:T168808.20120717 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 17 July 2012 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 1688/08 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 97915814.4 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | G02B 6/10 G02B 6/26 G02F 1/35 |
||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | D | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | AN OPTICAL ELEMENT | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.4.02 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | - unconvincing inventive step argument based on a skilled person not conversant with the language of a prior art document deemed closest prior art and lacking an available translation | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t081688eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021