Error message

Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Using ${var} in strings is deprecated, use {$var} instead in include_once() (line 1442 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).
Deprecated function: Optional parameter $type declared before required parameter $nid is implicitly treated as a required parameter in include_once() (line 1442 of /home/patently/domains/xepc.eu/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

T 0267/08 () of 29.11.2010

European Case Law Identifier:

ECLI:EP:BA:2010:T026708.20101129

Date of decision:

29 November 2010

Case number:

T 0267/08

Application number:

IPC class:

Language of proceedings:

EN

Distribution:

B

Download and more information:

Decision text in EN (PDF, 44Â KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in:	EN
Versions:	Unpublished

Title of application:

A device for iontophoretic administration of drugs

Applicant name:

HADASIT MEDICAL RESERACH SERVICES & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LTD.

Opponent name:

EYEGATE PHARMA S.A.

Board:

3.4.01

Headnote:

-

Relevant legal provisions:

European Patent Convention R 152

Keywords:

-

Catchwords:

Change of representation; original version of the authorisation not filed.

Cited decisions:

G 0002/97
J 0013/90
J 0012/94
J 0014/94
J 0027/94
J 0005/02

Citing decisions:

J 0019/10
J 0026/10
T 1846/11

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t080267eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

14 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Implementing Rules

X R.152 EPC Authorisations

Case Law Book: III Amendments

X CLR III V 1 Overview

X CLR III V 4.1 Filing of the authorisation

X CLR III A 1.2.1 Knowledge of the relevant legal provisions and the case law

X CLR III A 3.3.1 Area of party's own responsibility

X CLR III A 3.3.1.A Filing of valid appeal

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

X G 0002/97 (Good faith) of 12.11.1998

General Case Law

X J 0013/90 (Omitted payment not completed) of 10.12.1992

X J 0012/94 (Principle of good faith) of 16.2.1996

X J 0014/94 (Principle of good faith) of 15.12.1994

X J 0027/94 (Divisional application) of 27.2.1995

X J 0005/02 (Wiedereinsetzung/BERNAUER) of 30.7.2002

X J 0019/10 (Divisional application/N.N.) of 17.5.2011

X T 1846/11 () of 27.10.2016