| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2007:T004607.20070626 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 26 June 2007 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0046/07 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 97116697.0 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A01B 51/02 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Self-moving vehicle for agricultural and industrial uses | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | Osvaldo Silvestrin | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.04 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Restitutio in integrum Late payment of the fee for re-establishment Application for re-establishment deemed not to have been filed Appeal deemed not to have been filed |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
"If the fee for re-establishment of rights is paid after expiry of the two-month period laid down in Article 122(2) EPC, the application for re-establishment of rights does not come into existence and therefore the fee must be refunded even without a respective request" |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t070046eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
9 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO 2014, A76 - Interlocutory decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.5.06 dated 24 February 2014