| |
|---|---|
The participants at the 17th European Patent Judges' Symposium |
|
|
|
OPENING OF THE SYMPOSIUM AND WELCOMING ADDRESSES |
|
Ants KULL |
|
Wim VAN DER EIJK |
|
|
|
REPORT ON PROCEEDINGS |
|
Stefan LUGINBÜHL |
|
|
|
WORKING SESSION |
|
The Unified Patent Court |
|
State of play of implementation work |
|
Chair: Margot Fröhlinger (EPO) |
|
Carl JOSEFSSON Preselection and training of UPC judges |
|
Sir David KITCHIN Development of a common judicial culture and judgecraft among the judges of the UPC |
|
Comparison and interaction between EPO boards of appeal and national courts – state of play and solutions for the UPC |
|
Chair: Sir Robin Jacob (GB) |
|
Sir Richard ARNOLD A patent held in a binding ruling to have been infringed is subsequently revoked: what happens next? National practice and what will the UPC do? |
|
Marie COURBOULAY Different practices at national courts: a challenge for the UPC |
|
William CHANDLER Patentability of computer-implemented inventions (CIIs): state of play and developments |
|
Klaus GRABINSKI Comparison and interaction between EPO boards of appeal and national courts – state of play in German practice |
|
|
|
WORKING SESSION |
|
Latest case law concerning supplementary protection certificates |
|
Chair: Martine Regout (BE) |
|
İlhami GÜNEŞ Supplementary protection certificates in EU law: a compensation mechanism and Turkey's position |
|
Massimo SCUFFI Supplementary protection certificates: the evolution of European case law on the terms of patent extension and the scope of protection |
|
Rian KALDEN Discussion of recent CJEU case law on SPCs: the three 12 December 2013 cases |
|
|
|
WORKING SESSION |
|
What amendments are permissible in order to be in line with the requirements under Article 123(2) and (3) EPC? |
|
Chair: Manfred Vogel (AT) |
|
Fritz BLUMER What amendments are permissible in order to be in line with the requirements under Article 123(2) and (3) EPC? |
|
Klaus BACHER What amendments are admissible under Article 123(2) and (3) EPC? |
|
|
|
WORKING SESSION |
|
Recent developments in European and national patent law and case law |
|
Chair: Kai Härmand (EE) |
|
|
|
NATIONAL JUDGES' PRESENTATIONS |
|
CH Switzerland Dieter BRÄNDLE |
|
DK Denmark Hans Christian THOMSEN |
|
EPO European Patent Office Yvonne PODBIELSKI |
|
FR France Sophie DARBOIS |
|
GB United Kingdom Richard HACON |
|
IT Italy Gabriella MUSCOLO |
|
NL Netherlands Edger BRINKMAN |
|
RO Romania Andreia Liana CONSTANDA |
|
SE Sweden Peter STRÖMBERG |
|
|
|
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS |
|
|
|
ANNEX |
|
Case study Contents |
|
Introduction – Case study: "Extractor hood" |
|
|
|
Case study "Extractor hood" |
|
Dieter BRÄNDLE Tobias BREMI Dieter STAUDER Stefan LUGINBÜHL |
|
1. Presentation of the case study |
|
2. Statement of claim |
|
3. Defence |
|
4. Patent in suit - English translation of EP 1 234 567 B1 |
|
5. Citation - English translation of EP 1 134 501 A1 |
|
6. Questions |
|
7. Patent legislation |
|
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/official-journal/2015/etc/se5/p0.html
Date retrieved: 19 May 2021