In opinion G 1/02 (OJ 2003, 165), the Enlarged Board of Appeal examined the powers and duties of formalities officers in opposition proceedings, the underlying question being their competence to decide on the consequences of late payment of the opposition fee. Taking the view that T 295/01 (OJ 2002, 251) and T 1062/99 were divergent, the President asked the Enlarged Board of Appeal to consider whether points 4 and 6 of the Notice of 28.04.1999 conflicted with provisions of a higher level (OJ 2002, 466). The Enlarged Board stated that the provisions of the Notices of the Vice-President DG 2 were valid on the basis of R. 9(3) EPC 1973 (R. 11(3) EPC), under which formalities officers could be entrusted with duties falling to the examining and opposition divisions and involving no technical or legal difficulties. It therefore concluded that points 4 and 6 of the Notice of 28.04.1999 did not conflict with provisions of a higher level.
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/caselaw/2019/e/clr_iv_c_2_3_1.htm
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021