In TÂ 236/12 the drawings published in the patent specification had been replaced by those originally filed. Although the published drawings had disclosed technical information not derivable from those originals, their replacement did not broaden the scope of the patent. The technical features of the claims were explained in sufficient detail in the description, as read together with the originals, so the skilled person could still get a clear idea of the protected subject-matter and how it should look.
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/caselaw/2019/e/clr_ii_e_2_4_15.htm
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021