CLR II E 1.2.1 Description, claims and drawings

Regarding the concept of the content of the application as filed, G 3/89 (OJ 1993, 117) and G 11/91 (OJ 1993, 125) laid down that it related to the parts of the European patent application which determined the disclosure of the invention, namely the description, the claims and the drawings. Note however that since the revision of the EPC, when determining the application documents "as filed", account has to be taken of R. 40 and 56(3) EPC.

Amendments can only be made within the limits of what a skilled person would derive from the whole of these documents as filed (G 2/10, OJ 2012, 376). In T 676/90 the board considered that the content of an application was defined not only by features mentioned or shown therein but also by their relationship to each other. Accordingly, it found that a figure could never be interpreted in isolation from the overall content of the application but only in that general context.

In T 1544/08 the board held that, if the drawings of the originally filed application were in colour, it was these figures which must be used as the basis for determining whether subsequently filed figures contained added subject-matter within the meaning of Art. 123(2) EPC.

12 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

EPC Implementing Rules

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law