European Case Law Identifier: |
ECLI:EP:BA:2003:T041099.20030120 |
Date of decision: |
20 January 2003 |
Case number: |
T 0410/99 |
Application number: |
91903366.2 |
IPC class: |
D21C 3/02 |
Language of proceedings: |
EN |
Distribution: |
B |
Download and more information: |
|
Title of application: |
Process for preparing kraft pulp |
Applicant name: |
Metso Chemical Pulping Oy |
Opponent name: |
Kvaerner Pulping AB |
Board: |
3.3.06 |
Headnote: |
- |
Relevant legal provisions: |
|
Keywords: |
Clarity (main request, first and second auxiliary request) - no: wording of amended claim 1 not clear itself
Novelty (third and fifth auxiliary request) - no: all features of the claimed process are directly and unambiguously derivable from the cited prior art |
Catchwords: |
"If there is no evidence or reason for considering the explicit teaching of a prior art document as incomplete or wrong or giving rise to doubts about the results obtained, a party's allegation that a skilled person would have understood additional but undescribed features to be a necessary part of such prior art teaching cannot be accepted (point 3.2.6 of the Reasons for the Decision)"
|
Cited decisions: |
|
Citing decisions: |
|
9 references found.
Click
X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.
Case Law Book: I Patentability
Loading...
Case Law of the Enlarged Board
Loading...
General Case Law
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...