| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2002:T069398.20020425 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 25 April 2002 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0693/98 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 91110797.7 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | B60T 8/88 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Antilock brake control system | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | AISIN SEIKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | Robert Bosch GmbH | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.2.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Fresh ground for opposition (not admitted) Inventive step (yes) |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
The fact that amendments have been made to a claim in the course of the opposition proceedings does not allow an opponent to raise an admissible objection under Article 123(2) EPC at the appeal stage in the absence of the patentee's agreement, if such objection results from an amendment made before grant and has not been originally raised as a ground for opposition under Article 100(c) EPC pursuant to Rule 55(c) EPC (cf Point 2 of the reasons). |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t980693eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021