| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1996:T064292.19960222 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 22 February 1996 | ||||||||
| Case number: | T 0642/92 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 88105894.5 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | C08G 18/76 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | B | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Process for the preparation of polyisocyanate prepolymers and polyurethanes having high temperature performance and low hysteresis | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.3.03 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | - | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Novelty (yes) - after amendments Inventive step (no) - obvious combination of known features Clarity (yes) - product features deriving inherently from process features Representation - pending the relevant cases before the Enlarged Board, Articles 133 and 134 EPC are to be followed Evidence within the context of Article 117 EPC in effect means all the legal means excluding mere argument that tends to prove or to disprove a fact at issue before the Board |
||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t920642eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021