Multiple independent claims in one category are per se not a reason for an incomplete search[GL/ISPE 5.13; 5.14; ]
Generally, an opinion must be given on all searched claims. Only one independent claim in each category needs to be treated in detail; short comments would normally suffice for further independent claims.
Furthermore, if appropriate, an objection as to clarity and conciseness under Article 6 may be made under Box VIII of the WO‑ISA. The EPO as ISA may exercise its discretion to ask the applicant to clarify the subject-matter to be searched, applying the same procedure as described under GL/PCT‑EPO B‑VIII, 3.3 – GL/PCT‑EPO B‑VIII, 3.4.
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/guidelinespct/e/b_viii_4.htm
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
8 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPO PCT GL - B Search
XGL-PCT B VIII 3.1 Examples of impossibility to perform a meaningful search over the whole of the claimed scope