In proceedings under Article 112a, the provisions relating to proceedings before the Boards of Appeal shall apply, unless otherwise provided. Rule 115, paragraph 1, second sentence, Rule 118, paragraph 2, first sentence, and Rule 132, paragraph 2, shall not apply. The Enlarged Board of Appeal may specify a period deviating from Rule 4, paragraph 1, first sentence.
consisting of four legally qualified members and one technically qualified member shall decide on any petition not rejected under sub-paragraph (a).
The Enlarged Board of Appeal composed according to paragraph 2(a) shall decide without the involvement of other parties and on the basis of the petition.
Date retrieved: 02 November 2015
38 references found.Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.
EPC Implementing Rules
Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO 2015, A35 - Decision of the Administrative Council of 25 March 2015 approving amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (CA/D 3/15)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2014, p3 - II. BUSINESS DISTRIBUTION 2014 [ 1 ] II.1 Business distribution scheme of the Enlarged Board of Appeal for the year 2014
Case Law Book
Case Law Book: IV Divisional Applications
Case Law with Headnote
XR 2/08 Violation fondamentale de l'article 113 - non - nouveau motif d'opposition - oui - Ã©cartÃ© Ã tort - non - obligation [..]
General Case Law
XR 7/08 Petition rejected as clearly inadmissible / Referral of a question to the Enlarged Board of Appeal under Article 112 [..]
XR 3/09 Manifestement irrecevable (non) / Manifestement non fondÃ© (oui) / Violation de l'article 113 CBE: aucune distinction [..]
XR 7/09 Petition for review - allowable: fundamental violation of Article 113 EPC (statement setting out the grounds of appeal [..]
XR 21/09 Violation fondamentale de procÃ©dure: non respect du droit de se dÃ©fendre - Art. 113 CBE [non] / RequÃªte en [..]
XR 3/10 Petition for review - admissible - yes / Objection raised after decision was given - Rule 106 complied with - yes - [..]
XR 21/10 Violation fondamentale de l'Art. 113(1) - non / NÃ©cessaire neutralitÃ© des dÃ©bats - durÃ©e de la procÃ©dure orale
XR 4/11 Petition for review: - not clearly inadmissible - clearly unallowable / Violation of right to be heard - no
XR 8/11 ÃberprÃ¼fungsantrag teilweise offensichtlich unzulÃ¤ssig, teilweise offensichtlich unbegrÃ¼ndet / Verletzung des [..]
XR 14/11 Petition for review - clearly inadmissible / Failure to have raised an objection within the meaning of Rule 106 EPC - [..]