J 0012/85 (Inadmissible appeal) of 7.2.1986

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1986:J001285.19860207
Date of decision: 07 February 1986
Case number: J 0012/85
Application number: 80107209.1
IPC class: C07C 117/00
C07J 1/00
C07J 5/00
C07J 71/00
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: A
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 337 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: OJ | Published
Title of application: -
Applicant name: Kureha
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.1.01
Headnote: 1. A Board of Appeal can only examine appeals from decisions of other instances of the EPO (Article 21(1) EPC). Thus it cannot examine a request for a correction, based on Rule 89 EPC, of the decision under appeal. A decision on this request must be first rendered by the Examining Division before the matter can be referred to the Board of Appeal.
2. An applicant for a European patent may only be "adversely affected" within the meaning of Article 107 EPC by a decision to grant the patent if such a decision is inconsistent with what he has specifically requested.
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 21(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 97(2)(a)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 107
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 167(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 51(4)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 89
Keywords: Competence for correction of errors in decisions of first instance
Appeal/inadmissible
Inadmissible appeal
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
G 0001/97
J 0027/86
J 0017/04
J 0005/08
T 0156/90
T 0831/90
T 0392/91
T 0506/91
T 0649/92
T 0549/93
T 0562/94
T 0850/95
T 0542/96
T 0722/97
T 0473/98
T 1059/98
T 1101/99
T 0740/00
T 0084/02
T 0178/03
T 0591/05
T 0613/14

24 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPO Guidelines - H Amendments and Corrections

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law Book: V Priority

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law