T 0500/01 (Humanized Immunoglobulins/PROTEIN DESIGN LABS, INC.) of 12.11.2003

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2003:T050001.20031112
Date of decision: 12 November 2003
Case number: T 0500/01
Application number: 90903576.8
IPC class: C12P 21/08
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: B
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 72 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Humanized Immunoglobulins and their production and use
Applicant name: PROTEIN DESIGN LABS, INC.
Opponent name: 02. ICOS Corp.
03. Novartis AG
04. Celltech Therapeutics Ltd
05. Bayer AG
06. Chiron Corporation
08. Genentech, Inc.
09. IDEC Pharmaceuticals Corpn
10. Biotest Pharma GmbH
11. Biotransplant, Inc
12. Bristol-Myers Company
13. GLAXO GROUP LIMITED
14. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH
17. Schering Corporation
18. Ixsys, Inc
Board: 3.3.04
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 111
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 123(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 123(3)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 84
Keywords: Main request and auxiliary request I - added matter (yes)
Auxiliary request II - added matter (no), clarity (yes)
Remittal - (yes)
Catchwords:

According to Article 123(2) EPC, a European patent application or a European patent may not be amended in such a way that it contains subject-matter which extends beyond the content of the application as filed. A claim, the wording of which is essentially identical to a claim as originally filed, can nevertheless contravene the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC, if it contains a feature whose definition has been amended in the description in a non-allowable way. The specific definition of a feature, which according to the description is an overriding requirement of the claimed invention, is applied by a skilled reader to interpret this feature whenever it is mentioned in the patent (see points (11) to (15) of the Reasons for the Decision).

Cited decisions:
G 0009/91
G 0010/91
J 0016/90
T 0577/97
T 0190/99
T 0243/99
Citing decisions:
T 0061/03
T 0499/03
T 0742/04
T 0843/04
T 0725/05
T 0452/08
T 0620/08
T 0269/09
T 0343/09
T 0852/09
T 1388/09
T 2045/09
T 1147/11

17 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application

Case Law Book: V Priority

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law