If the applicant does not approve the text according to the auxiliary request as proposed in the communication under Rule 71(3), the procedure is as set out in C‑V, 4 (see in particular C‑V, 4.7, and C‑V, 4.6.2).
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/guidelines/e/h_iii_3_3_6.htm
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
6 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPC Implementing Rules
EPO Guidelines - C Procedureal Aspects of Substantive Examination
XGL C V 4.6.2 Second Rule 71(3) communication based on higher-ranking request initially rejected in first Rule 71(3) communication