T 0493/88 (Spacer grid) of 13.12.1989

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1989:T049388.19891213
Date of decision: 13 December 1989
Case number: T 0493/88
Application number: 81400060.0
IPC class: G21C 3/34
Language of proceedings: FR
Distribution:
Download and more information:
No PDF available
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: DE | EN | FR
Versions: OJ
Title of application: -
Applicant name: CEA-FRAMATOM
Opponent name: Siemens
Board: 3.4.01
Headnote: 1. Under the provisions of Articles 101(1) and 102(2) EPC, an Opposition Division cannot validly hold that an opposition must be rejected until it has assured itself that none of the grounds for opposition listed in Article 100 EPC preclude the maintenance of the European patent at issue. It may not confine its examination merely to the grounds expressly mentioned in the notice of opposition but must examine the facts of its own motion in accordance with Article 114(1) EPC.
2. A decision of an Opposition Division rejecting the opposition is not correctly reasoned within the meaning of the first sentence of Rule 68(2) EPC if, after giving the reasons why the Opposition Division, unlike the opponent, considers the subject- matter of the patent to be new, it fails to state the reasons why it considers that the subject-matter also involves an inventive step.
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 100
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 101(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 102(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 114(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 55(c)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 68(2) Sent 1
Keywords: Insufficiently reasoned decision
Examination of the opposition
Scope of the powers of Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal
Examination by the EPO of its own motion
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
J 0017/93
J 0031/96
T 0254/89
T 0392/89
T 0086/91
T 0817/93
T 0933/10
T 0526/12
T 0899/17

10 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law Book: V Priority

General Case Law