T 0020/81 (Aryloxybenzaldehydes) of 10.2.1982

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:1982:T002081.19820210
Date of decision: 10 February 1982
Case number: T 0020/81
Application number: 78200383.4
IPC class: -
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: A
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 528 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: OJ | Published
Title of application: -
Applicant name: Shell
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.3.01
Headnote: In order to render them relevant to the definition of the problem underlying the invention, and hence to the assess- ment of inventive step, alleged advantages should be supported by sufficient evidence where comparison is made with highly pertinent prior art.
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 56
European Patent Convention 1973 R 27(1)(d)
Keywords: Inventive step - support by sufficient evidence
Significance - technical problem
Examples - truly comparative
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
-
Citing decisions:
T 0011/87
T 0346/89
T 0020/90
T 0052/90
T 0201/90
T 0245/90
T 0910/90
T 0686/91
T 0766/91
T 0859/91
T 0279/92
T 0465/92
T 0653/92
T 0939/92
T 1014/92
T 0039/93
T 0152/93
T 0352/93
T 0583/93
T 0659/93
T 0813/93
T 0055/94
T 0056/94
T 0164/94
T 0561/94
T 0692/94
T 0912/94
T 0315/95
T 0805/95
T 0284/96
T 0327/96
T 0432/96
T 0460/96
T 0955/96
T 0053/97
T 0108/97
T 0261/97
T 0325/97
T 0355/97
T 0610/97
T 0747/97
T 0763/97
T 1051/97
T 1071/97
T 1164/97
T 0684/98
T 0922/98
T 0227/99
T 0309/99
T 0427/99
T 0539/99
T 0682/99
T 1049/99
T 0047/00
T 0135/00
T 0681/00
T 0717/00
T 0808/00
T 0988/00
T 0133/01
T 0177/01
T 0320/01
T 0591/01
T 0892/01
T 0311/02
T 0391/02
T 0522/02
T 0836/02
T 0881/02
T 0902/02
T 1033/02
T 0235/03
T 0966/03
T 1034/03
T 0157/04
T 0176/04
T 0417/04
T 0418/04
T 0513/04
T 0516/04
T 0852/04
T 1412/04
T 0028/05
T 0079/05
T 0148/05
T 0258/05
T 0259/05
T 0529/05
T 0540/05
T 0668/05
T 0995/05
T 1045/05
T 1145/05
T 1368/05
T 0107/06
T 0276/06
T 0281/06
T 0327/06
T 0354/06
T 0946/06
T 1114/06
T 1277/06
T 1753/06
T 0574/07
T 0611/07
T 1485/07
T 1605/07
T 1705/07
T 1761/07
T 1994/07
T 0615/08
T 1333/08
T 1469/08
T 1652/08
T 1877/08
T 0173/09
T 0175/09
T 0181/09
T 0236/09
T 0260/09
T 0398/09
T 0406/09
T 2028/09
T 2034/09
T 2043/09
T 0153/10
T 0832/10
T 0875/10
T 1080/10
T 1113/10
T 1591/10
T 2418/10
T 2474/10
T 1641/11
T 2007/11
T 2112/11
T 2610/11
T 2614/11
T 0493/12
T 1357/12
T 0488/13
T 2179/13
T 2194/13
T 0389/14
T 0807/14
T 1020/14
T 1926/14
T 0186/15
T 1312/15
T 1924/16
T 0990/17
T 1208/17

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t810020ex1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

60 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: I Patentability

General Case Law