T 2451/13 () of 14.1.2016

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2016:T245113.20160114
Date of decision: 14 January 2016
Case number: T 2451/13
Application number: 07715867.3
IPC class: A23L 1/29
A23L 1/30
A23L 1/212
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: C
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 468 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: SENSORIC IMPRINTING
Applicant name: N.V. Nutricia
Opponent name: NESTEC S.A.
Board: 3.3.09
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention Art 53(c)
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
European Patent Convention Art 56
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 12(4)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(1)
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13(3)
Keywords: Review of first-instance decision to admit late-filed ground
Ground for opposition under Article 100(a)/53(c) EPC
Admissibility of new objection under Article 123(2) EPC
Admissibility of late-filed auxiliary request
Admissibility of document filed in response to the statement of grounds of appeal
Public availability of commercial brochure from opponent - standard of proof
Kit of parts - inventive step
Catchwords:

If the publication date of a document originating from an opponent (or a subsidiary thereof) is in dispute, the opponent must prove that date "up to the hilt". The yardstick for this proof is that of "beyond reasonable doubt" rather than "absolute certainty" (point 3.2).

Cited decisions:
G 0007/93
T 0743/89
T 0472/92
T 0782/92
T 0097/94
T 0055/01
T 1257/04
T 0804/05
T 1553/06
T 0002/09
T 1635/09
Citing decisions:
T 1107/12
T 0842/14
T 1262/15
T 1625/17
T 0552/18
T 0734/18

28 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

EPO Guidelines - G Patentability

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: I Patentability

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law