European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:2009:T232108.20090511 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date of decision: | 11 May 2009 | ||||||||
Case number: | T 2321/08 | ||||||||
Application number: | 06024212.0 | ||||||||
IPC class: | H03M 13/11 | ||||||||
Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
Distribution: | B | ||||||||
Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
Title of application: | Apparatus and method for transmitting/receiving signal in a communication system | ||||||||
Applicant name: | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al | ||||||||
Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
Board: | 3.5.02 | ||||||||
Headnote: | - | ||||||||
Relevant legal provisions: | |||||||||
Keywords: | Applicability of Rule 42(1)(b) - (no) Rule 27(1)(b) - incorrect application - (yes) Right to amend - violation (yes) Remittal for further prosecution (yes) Reimbursement of the appeal fee - (yes) |
||||||||
Catchwords: |
1. Rule 27(1)(b) EPC 1973, or equivalent Rule 42(1)(b) EPC 2000, does not put a stringent obligation on the applicant to acknowledge prior art known to him, and to cite documents known to him reflecting this prior art, already at the time of filing the application. 2. No requirement of the EPC prohibits amending an application in order to meet the provisions set out in Rule 27(1)(b) EPC 1973 or Rule 42(1)(b) EPC 2000. |
||||||||
Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
Citing decisions: |
|
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t082321eu1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021