T 2003/08 (Dilated cardiomyopathy/EDWARDS) of 31.10.2012

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2012:T200308.20121031
Date of decision: 31 October 2012
Case number: T 2003/08
Application number: 96941378.0
IPC class: A61K 35/14
A61P 9/00
C07K 1/22
A61M 1/36
C07K 14/72
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: C
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 356 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished | Unpublished v2
Title of application: Treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy by removal of autoantibodies
Applicant name: Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Reinke, Petra
Brehme, Stefan
Baumann, Gert
Felix, Stephan
Opponent name: Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH
Board: 3.3.04
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention Art 53(c)
European Patent Convention Art 54(1)
European Patent Convention Art 54(2)
European Patent Convention Art 54(4)
European Patent Convention Art 56
European Patent Convention Art 83
European Patent Convention Art 84
European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a)
European Patent Convention Art 117
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
European Patent Convention R 117
European Patent Convention R 118(1)
European Patent Convention R 118(2)(a)
European Patent Convention R 118(2)(c)
European Patent Convention R 120(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 54(5)
Keywords: "Request not to hear a witness due to failure to reply to the invitation in accordance with Rule 118(c) EPC (refused)";
"Request for referral of questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (refused)";
Main request: added subject-matter (yes)
Auxiliary request: claims to be interpreted as relating to a second medical use (yes) - means used in the treatment to be considered as a substance or composition in the sense of decision G 5/83; oral disclosure at a lecture - evidence from the lecturer and a member of the audience may be sufficient to establish the oral disclosure - contrary to the application by the first instance of decision T 1212/97; oral disclosure and prior use - established beyond reasonable doubt (no); conformity of the claims with the requirements of the EPC (yes)
Catchwords:

see points 6 to 21 and 30 to 48

Cited decisions:
G 0001/83
G 0005/83
G 0006/83
G 0001/04
G 0002/08
T 0017/81
T 0227/91
T 0329/94
T 0138/95
T 0789/96
T 0775/97
T 1212/97
T 0138/02
T 0144/04
T 0448/05
T 1314/05
T 1075/06
T 0213/07
T 1695/07
T 1099/09
Citing decisions:
T 0773/10
T 0843/15
T 1758/15
T 2136/15
T 0264/17
T 2187/17

42 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

EPC Implementing Rules

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: I Patentability

Case Law Book: III Amendments

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law