T 1075/06 () of 17.5.2011

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2011:T107506.20110517
Date of decision: 17 May 2011
Case number: T 1075/06
Application number: 00961403.3
IPC class: A61M 37/00
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: B
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 51 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Blood separation systems and methods using a multiple function pump station to perform different on-line processing tasks
Applicant name: Fenwal, Inc.
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.2.02
Headnote: I. Venipuncture of blood donors and the extraction of blood from a donor's body represent substantial physical interventions on the body which require professional medical expertise to be carried out and which entail a substantial health risk even when carried out with the required professional care and expertise. A method claim comprising steps encompassing such procedures is a method for treatment of the human body by surgery which is excluded from patentability under Article 53(c) EPC (Reasons, 2.1.1).
II. A method claim comprising the step of returning processed blood, depleted of some of its components and charged with an anticoagulant, to a donor is a method for treatment of the human body by therapy which is excluded from patentability under Article 53(c) EPC (Reasons, 2.1.2).
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention Art 53(c)
European Patent Convention Art 54(1)
European Patent Convention Art 54(2)
European Patent Convention Art 123(2)
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 52(4)
Keywords: Exclusion from patentability (yes)
Novelty (no)
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
G 0001/04
G 0001/07
T 0245/87
T 0329/94
T 0663/02
Citing decisions:
T 1695/07
T 2003/08
T 1599/09
T 1927/16

11 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

Case Law Book: I Patentability

Case Law of the Enlarged Board

General Case Law