R 0019/10 () of 16.3.2011

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2011:R001910.20110316
Date of decision: 16 March 2011
Case number: R 0019/10
Petition for review of: T 0945/09
Application number: 97950310.9
IPC class: A61K 31/495
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: B
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 34 KB)
Documentation of the appeal procedure can be found in the Register
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: Unpublished
Title of application: Use of taurolidine or taurultam for the prevention and the treatment of infections in delivery systems
Applicant name: Ed Geistlich Söhne AG Für Chemische Industrie
Opponent name: TauroPharm GmbH
Board: EBA
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(c)
European Patent Convention Art 112a(2)(d)
European Patent Convention Art 113
European Patent Convention R 102
European Patent Convention R 104(b)
European Patent Convention R 106
European Patent Convention R 107
European Patent Convention R 108
Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15(5)
Keywords: Petition for review - clearly unallowable
Catchwords:

It is not a procedural duty of the Boards of Appeal under Rule 104(b) EPC to analyse the submissions of the parties in order to identify potential requests which were not explicitly made by the parties (point 5.2).

Cited decisions:
R 0002/08
R 0009/08
T 0158/96
T 0763/04
T 1557/07
Citing decisions:
R 0023/10
R 0017/11
R 0004/12
R 0019/12
R 0002/13
R 0002/14
R 0003/14
T 1969/07
T 1843/11
T 1898/11
T 0374/12
T 0786/15
T 1624/16

Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/r100019eu1.html

Date retrieved: 17 May 2021

31 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

EPC Articles

EPC Implementing Rules

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: IV Divisional Applications

Case Law Book: V Priority

General Case Law