| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EP:BA:1996:J001694.19960610 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date of decision: | 10 June 1996 | ||||||||
| Case number: | J 0016/94 | ||||||||
| Application number: | 93203101.6 | ||||||||
| IPC class: | A61K 38/25 | ||||||||
| Language of proceedings: | EN | ||||||||
| Distribution: | A | ||||||||
| Download and more information: |
|
||||||||
| Title of application: | Method of enhancing mental function | ||||||||
| Applicant name: | APPLIED RESEARCH SYSTEMS ARS HOLDING N.V. | ||||||||
| Opponent name: | - | ||||||||
| Board: | 3.1.01 | ||||||||
| Headnote: | For a notice of appeal to comply with Article 108, first sentence, and Rule 64(b) EPC, it must express the definite intention to contest an appealable decision. An appeal filed as a subsidiary request, i.e. subject to the condition that the main request be allowed by the first instance, is therefore inadmissible. | ||||||||
| Relevant legal provisions: |
|
||||||||
| Keywords: | Form of appeal - admissible (no) | ||||||||
| Catchwords: |
- |
||||||||
| Cited decisions: |
|
||||||||
| Citing decisions: |
|
||||||||
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/j940016ex1.html
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
25 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.Offical Journal of the EPO
XOJ EPO SE 1/2021, p179 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2020)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2020, p174 - Annex 1 - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2019)
XOJ EPO SE 1/2019, p158 - XVI. - Index of published decisions of the boards of appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal - (as at 31 December 2018)