J 0024/03 (Time limit definition/N.N.) of 17.2.2004

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2004:J002403.20040217
Date of decision: 17 February 2004
Case number: J 0024/03
Application number: -
IPC class: -
Language of proceedings: EN
Distribution: A
Download and more information:
Decision text in EN (PDF, 23 KB)
-
Bibliographic information is available in: EN
Versions: OJ | Published
Title of application: Image processing apparatus
Applicant name: -
Opponent name: -
Board: 3.1.01
Headnote: I. A time limit within the meaning of Article 122(1) EPC involves a period of a legally indicated length fixed for carrying out a particular procedural act.
II. In procedural law, the fact that a conditional act can only be accomplished before a particular set of circumstances foreseen by a legal provision occurs (condition), is conceptually different from a set period of time imposed for doing an act (time limit) because in the first case the duration of the period in which the act should be completed is determined by the occurrence of the condition itself, whereas in the second case it is pre-determined from the outset.
III. Rule 25(1) EPC does not impose any time limit for filing a divisional application but rather sets a condition namely that the earlier European patent application is pending. Therefore, no time limit within the meaning of Article 122 EPC is imposed by this rule.
Relevant legal provisions:
European Patent Convention 1973 Art 122(1)
European Patent Convention 1973 R 25(1)
Keywords: Re-establishment of rights - concept of time limit
Catchwords:

-

Cited decisions:
J 0003/83
Citing decisions:
J 0004/02
J 0003/04
J 0018/04
J 0002/08
J 0019/10
J 0026/10

11 references found.

Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.

Offical Journal of the EPO

Case Law Book: II Conditions to be met by an Application

Case Law Book: III Amendments

General Case Law