See ISPE Guidelines 4.13.[Art. 5; ]
If the claims for a perpetual motion machine are directed to its function, and not merely to its structure, an objection arises not only under Art. 5 but also under Art. 33(4) in that the invention is not "industrially applicable" (see GL/PCT‑EPO G‑III, 1).
Source: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/guidelinespct/e/f_iii_3.htm
Date retrieved: 17 May 2021
8 references found.
Click X to load a reference inside the current page, click on the title to open in a new page.EPO PCT GL - F (not assigned)
XGL-PCT F III 4 Burden of proof as regards the possibility of performing and repeating the invention